2005
Our Answer to Le Déaut Questioning the Independence of CRIIGEN: PDF Print E-mail
Written by HH   
Wednesday, 14 April 2010

To avoid having to answer questions asked by CRIIGEN on the health risks of GMOs and on the toxicity of the Roundup included in a large number of GMOs, M. Le Déaut prefers trying to question CRIIGEN’s independence on the grounds that we might have received funds from Carrefour Group. Beside the pathetic and overused character of this procedure, repeating the behaviour of those who tried to conceal the dangers of asbestos and other dangerous products, it goes without saying that CRIIGEN, which is formed by totally independent experts from the GMO lobby, is a recognized expertal body. This is the reason why CRIIGEN conducted studies on behalf of Carrefour and Auchan, as well as on behalf the Italian and Quebecker governments, the Biosafety Committee of China, the University of Montreal, the Tunisian and Egyptian Universities, the Directorate-General for Agriculture of the European Commission and several professional unions in the food-processing industry and in agriculture. The fact that M. Le Déaut is trying to present CRIIGEN in an ill-intentioned and truncated manner clearly demonstrates, if it were needed, that the work accomplished by CRIIGEN to make the GMO studies transparent is clearly disturbing him and that his report, which had been exposed by CRIIGEN on the grounds of the method used even before the content was revealed is solely written in the defence of GMOs. We would very much like that the transparent approach displayed by CRIIGEN where the addressees of the studies are concerned should be applied by all the experts who expressed themselves in the Parliamentary Mission.

 

Last Updated ( Saturday, 01 May 2010 )
Read more...
 
Producing Drugs in an Open Transgenic Maize Field: June 2005 PDF Print E-mail
Written by HH   
Thursday, 11 January 2007

CRIIGEN has decided to refer the case of a decision of the French Ministry of Agriculture dated 27 April 2005 to the Administrative Court of Clermont-Ferrand authorizing a project application of Meristem Therapeutics on the deliberate release in the environment of genetically modified maize with a view to produce dog gastric lipase. CRIIGEN is not exposing the actual dog gastric lipase production from a GMO, but its production in an open field. As a consequence, we wish to remind the Ministry of Agriculture the United-States have just precisely limited that type of practice following an accident that took place in 2002 when ProdiGene contaminated 500.000 tonnes of soy with a GMO maize producing a porcine vaccine. France is not implementing Directive 2001/18 in relation to GMO experiments in open fields and therefore not applying the precautionary principle; studies on the GMO receiving environment have not been conductedeither, nor have available traceability methods been developed to find out whether a food maize might be contaminated or not by this non-approved dog enzyme drug.

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 April 2010 )
 
CADA Orders the Removal of the Secret Status on Studies Conducted on Rats Fed on GMOs: May 2005 PDF Print E-mail
Written by HH   
Thursday, 11 January 2007
For a number of months, CRIIGEN has had to fight so that the studies highlighting significant effects on health for rats fed on GMOs should be made public. First, the French Ministry of Agriculture refused yielding, giving as a pretext the secrecy of the proceedings of the government, then, as a second excuse, a case of industrial secrecy. The case was submitted to CADA (French Commission for the Access to Administrative Documents) by CRIIGEN, and CADA ordered the release of the studies on rats fed on Bt11 in conformity with Directive 2001-18, and that there could be no confidentiality status in relation to effects on human health and the environment. As far as other GMOs are concerned, for which the initial authorization applications were not submitted in France, CADA estimated that the French Government was linked to the decisions of the states were the decision was originally made. As a consequence, CADA suggested that CRIIGEN should directly refer the case to the European Commission, which we did straight away on April 12. However CADA indicated that all the studies and analyses conducted in France on the same GMOs had to be divulged, so CRIIGEN referred the case to the Ministry of Agriculture one more time. This is a major victory against GMO manufacturers, who, with the diligent help of the Government, are trying at all costs to avoid a real scientific debate on the effects of GMOs on human health, despite the fact such effects are revealed by their own studies.



Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 April 2010 )
 
Concerns Over the Report of the Le Déaut Mission: May 2005 PDF Print E-mail
Written by HH   
Thursday, 11 January 2007

 

At CRII-GEN we were somewhat disappointed by the lack of objectivity and impartiality displayed in the methods of some of the leaders of the Parliamentary Mission on GMOs, starting with its President, Jean-Yves Le Déaut. This shortcoming emerged not only when the President took a public stance, without any nuance, in a journal published by the seed manufacturers promoting GMOs, during the mission, but also when he smeared the personalities before their hearing by the commission and when he tried to put aside those with potentially disturbing questions. Furthermore, this continued after the hearings to try to reduce the scope of the criticism formulated on the assessment of GMOs. In fact, essential and topical questions were completely ignored: 

- Inability of the public authorities to organise precise traceability methods for experimental GMOs, which would make it possible to follow disseminations up, and therefore implement the necessary measures to isolate the GMOs in question as requested by the government.

- Inability to develop transparency and counter-evaluation for tests on human health, ignoring the conclusions that need to be drawn from significant metabolic problems for rats,

- The debate on Roundup was totally ignored! Roundup is the most widely used herbicide in the world, along with the food GMOs that were designed to tolerate it. This was done during the session, by distributing a report going over Monsanto’s data and signed by an author who is not even a toxicologist, but who has been involved in the lax assessment of GMOs.

Such practices make it very difficult for the members of the mission to build their own objective opinion on such a controversial and complex topic. Therefore, the risk of distortion of the information is even far greater with Members of Parliament who are not members of the commission who were assigned this work. 

PS: The attachments corresponding to the letters that attest the facts mentioned above are available upon request.

 

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 April 2010 )
 
Revelations on the Toxicity of GMOs: March 2005 PDF Print E-mail
Written by HH   
Thursday, 11 January 2007

CRIIGEN Reveals Serious Anomalies Observed in Rats Fed on GMOs

 

The expertise dossiers have been deliberately kept secret, the decision procedures are deliberately difficult to understand… It was after an incredible obstacle course that the Committee for Independent Research and Information on Genetic Engineering (CRIIGEN)* finally succeeded in obtaining from the Governmental Commission in charge of the Human Health Risk Assessment of GMOs the new documents proving the risks of GMOs for human health. Studies highlighting serious malformations in animals fed on GMOs have deliberately been kept secret. This new affair demonstrates the risks of GMOs for human health and the fact that they are being totally ignored. CRIIGEN wants to expose such practices which not only are in violation of the provisions of European Law, but also highlight the carelessness with which such major issues for public health are overlooked. At CRIIGEN, we want to bring the elements we obtained to the scientific debate. We demand that the studies on the toxicity of GMOs conducted on animals should be published, as they are the necessary base for establishing scientific controversy and independent expertise.

 

 

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 April 2010 )
 
New studies on Roundup: March 2005 PDF Print E-mail
Written by HH   
Thursday, 11 January 2007

The group of Pr. Gilles-Eric SERALINI in Caen University has just published an original research work on the toxicity of Roundup, one of the most sold herbicides worldwide and most often used with GMO plants. Most of the commercialized GMOs in the world are intended for food, and have been genetically modified in order not to die when they absorb this herbicide after it is spread on crops. This procedure makes it easy to use Roundup, and also generates Roundup residues in the food chain. This herbicide is suspected of being a major pollutant of rivers. It was demonstrated in this research work that human placenta cells are very sensitive to Roundup, at much lower concentrations than in agricultural uses. This might explain why there are so many miscarriages and premature births in the United-States among farmers. Furthermore, below the toxic threshold, the effects of Roundup are measured on the synthesis of sexual hormones. This allows to classify this herbicide as a potential endocrine disruptor. In short, the effects of Roundup are always greater than that of glyphosate, which is known as its active principle.

This research was conducted with the support of CRIIGEN ( www.crii-gen.org ) and of the Fondation pour une Terre Humaine (Foundation for a Humane Earth) http://www.terrehumaine.org 

 

Richard S, Moslemi S, Sipahutar H, Benachour N, Seralini GE. 2005. Differential effects of glyphosate and Roundup on human placental cells and aromatase Environ Health Perspect: doi:10.1289/ehp.7728. [Online 25 February 2005] http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2005/7728/abstract.html

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 April 2010 )